Occurrence record: S:S10-18646

Specimen of Orchidaceae recorded on http://imagens1.jbrj.gov.br/fsi/server?type=image&source=smnh/Plantas_do_Brasil_2017_02/S10-18646.jpg

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Museu de História Natural da Suécia
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "S"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "S"
catalogNumber	S10-18646
occurrenceID	5003790
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
Collector	G. F. J. Pabst;
recordNumber	1077
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	7/1951
Rightsholder	S
bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=5003790
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
identificationRemarks	s. d.

Event

identificationRemarks	s. d.
Occurrence date	Year: , Month: 07, Day: 1951 Supplied as year:--/7/1951 month:1951 day:7
Date precision	Not Supplied
eventRemarks	In rupibus, locis umbrosis.

Taxonomy

scientificName	Orchidaceae
taxonRank	family
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Liliopsida
Order	Asparagales
Family	Orchidaceae Supplied as "Orchidaceae cyclopogon argyrifolius (barb. rodr.) barb. rodr."
Genus	Orchidaceae
Species	Orchidaceae cyclopogon
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Higher taxon match The match is based on the higher level classification.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
infraspecificEpithet	argyrifolius
scientificNameAuthorship	ESPECIE

Geospatial

Country	Brazil
State or Territory	BR
minimumElevationInMeters	Prope Campo Grande - (Est. Rio de Janeiro)
fieldNotes	7/1951
municipality	Rio de Janeiro
countryCode	Brazil

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Invalid collection date	Failed
Invalid collection date	Failed
Day and month transposed	Warning
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Country inferred from coordinates	Warning
Show/Hide 10 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 14 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Missing identification date	Missing
Missing taxonomic rank	Missing
Name not supplied	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Name match metric		higherMatch
	scientificName		Orchidaceae
	class		Liliopsida
	taxonConceptID		364551
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		138655
	infraspecificEpithet	argyrifolius
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395637
	genus	Orchidaceae
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Asparagales
	taxonRank		family
	specificEpithet	cyclopogon
	Order id		395645
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Family id		364551
	family	Orchidaceae cyclopogon argyrifolius (barb. rodr.) barb. rodr.	Orchidaceae
	Taxon rank id		5000
	scientificNameAuthorship	ESPECIE
	Right		160723
Event	Date precision		Not Supplied
	eventDate	http://imagens1.jbrj.gov.br/fsi/server?type=image&source=smnh/Plantas_do_Brasil_2017_02/S10-18646.jpg
	year	--/7/1951
	eventRemarks	In rupibus, locis umbrosis.
	day	7	1951
	month	1951	07
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identificationRemarks	s. d.
Occurrence	occurrenceID	5003790
	fieldNotes	7/1951
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	G. F. J. Pabst;	G. F. J. Pabst;
	Rightsholder	S
	recordNumber	1077
	bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=5003790
	institutionCode	S
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	S10-18646
	collectionCode	S
Attribution	Data resource		Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Museu de História Natural da Suécia
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr231
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country		Brazil
	stateProvince	BR
	municipality	Rio de Janeiro
	countryCode	Brazil
	minimumElevationInMeters	Prope Campo Grande - (Est. Rio de Janeiro)

Occurrence record: S:S10-18646

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by