Occurrence record: PEL:6248

Specimen of Amphilophium crucigerum | Pente-de-macaco recorded on 1963-11-05

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Herbário PEL - Universidade Federal de Pelotas
institutionCode	Universidade Federal de Pelotas Supplied institution code "UFPEL"
collectionCode	Herbário PEL Supplied collection code "PEL"
catalogNumber	6248
otherCatalogNumbers	HB 30001
occurrenceID	BR:UFPEL:PEL:6240
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
preparations	Exsicata
identifiedBy	J. Durigon
Identified date	2014
Collector	Pereira, E. Edmundo\|Hatschbach, G. Supplied as "Edmundo Pereira \| G. Hatschbach"
recordNumber	7664
reproductiveCondition	Flor
Rightsholder	Universidade Federal de Pelotas
datasetName	Herbário PEL
language	pt
dynamicProperties	{"barcode":"PEL0001071"}
occurrenceRemarks	Trepadeira de flores brancas int. amarelada.
occurrenceStatus	present
institutionID	92.242.080/0001-00
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2014

Event

Occurrence date	1963-11-05
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Amphilophium crucigerum Supplied scientific name "Amphilopium crucigerum (L.) L.G.Lohmann"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "sp."
Common name	Pente-de-macaco
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Lamiales
Family	Bignoniaceae
Genus	Amphilophium Supplied as "Amphilopium"
Species	Amphilophium crucigerum
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Fuzzy match A match was determined by using a sound expression of the supplied name.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	(L.) L.G.Lohmann

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Paraná
locationRemarks	Papagaio
continent	América do Sul
county	Ponta Grossa
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 21 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 53 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Amphilophium crucigerum
	Name match metric		fuzzyMatch
	vernacularName		Pente-de-macaco
	scientificName	Amphilopium crucigerum (L.) L.G.Lohmann	Amphilophium crucigerum
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		381579
	taxonConceptID		381593
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		16289
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Amphilopium	Amphilophium
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Lamiales
	taxonRank	sp.	species
	specificEpithet	crucigerum
	Order id		395633
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		381593
	Family id		381096
	family	Bignoniaceae	Bignoniaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	(L.) L.G.Lohmann
	Right		16289
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	1963-11-05	1963-11-05
	year		1963
	day		05
	month		11
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2014	2014
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	J. Durigon
Occurrence	occurrenceID	BR:UFPEL:PEL:6240
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Edmundo Pereira \| G. Hatschbach	Pereira, E. Edmundo\|Hatschbach, G.
	modified	2021-10-20	2021-10-20
	Rightsholder	Universidade Federal de Pelotas
	datasetName	Herbário PEL
	language	pt
	recordNumber	7664
	otherCatalogNumbers	HB 30001
	institutionCode	UFPEL
	dynamicProperties	{"barcode":"PEL0001071"}
	occurrenceRemarks	Trepadeira de flores brancas int. amarelada.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	reproductiveCondition	Flor
	preparations	Exsicata
	catalogNumber	6248
	institutionID	92.242.080/0001-00
	collectionCode	PEL
Attribution	Collection uid		co128
	Data resource		Herbário PEL - Universidade Federal de Pelotas
	Institution uid		in39
	Collection name		Herbário PEL
	Data provider uid		dp5
	Institution name		Universidade Federal de Pelotas
	Data resource uid	dr239
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	locationRemarks	Papagaio
	country	Brasil	Brasil
	continent	América do Sul
	county	Ponta Grossa
	stateProvince	Paraná
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: PEL:6248

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by