Occurrence record: Observations:112612872

HumanObservation of Mecometopus batesii recorded on 2022-04-23

View original record API

Dataset

Data partner	iNaturalist
Data resource	Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "iNaturalist"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "Observations"
catalogNumber	112612872
occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112612872
basisOfRecord	Human observation Supplied basis "humanObservation"
identifiedBy	Jackson Cordeiro Brilhador
Identified date	2022-04-24T18:50:57
Collector	Dantas, S. Sidnei Supplied as "Sidnei Dantas"
sex	FEMALE
lifeStage	Adult
License	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC_BY_NC_4_0
Rightsholder	Sidnei Dantas
datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
occurrenceStatus	present Supplied as PRESENT
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2022-04-24 Supplied as 2022-04-24T18:50:57
identificationID	252108140
identificationRemarks	A espécie panamenha apresenta a mancha pronotal preta bilobada posteriormente,[1] porém, a mancha do espécime é trilobada anteriormente. Além disso, no espécime apresenta na parte posterior uma pequena mancha diamantiforme, sendo ausente na panamenha. Comparando o espécime com os clitinos do New World Cerambycidae Catalog, deparei com a espécie Mecotopus batesii,[2] essa espécie apresenta o mesmo padrão de manchas, e apresenta ocorrência no Brasil (AM, PA, ?RO) e no Peru.[3] Portanto, esse é o primeiro registro da espécie para o estado do Mato Grosso, e do iNaturalist. E considerando o comprimento das antenas é um indivíduo fêmea. ————— Figura 1: Padrão das manchas pronotais das espécies N. englemani e M. batesii. Autor: @jcbrilhador, com base nos espécimes do NWCC. ————— Referências 1 - [NWCC-4895](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4895&w=n) 2 - [NWCC-4705](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4705&w=n) 3 - Monné, 2021, pt. I, p. 116.

Event

identificationRemarks	A espécie panamenha apresenta a mancha pronotal preta bilobada posteriormente,[1] porém, a mancha do espécime é trilobada anteriormente. Além disso, no espécime apresenta na parte posterior uma pequena mancha diamantiforme, sendo ausente na panamenha. Comparando o espécime com os clitinos do New World Cerambycidae Catalog, deparei com a espécie Mecotopus batesii,[2] essa espécie apresenta o mesmo padrão de manchas, e apresenta ocorrência no Brasil (AM, PA, ?RO) e no Peru.[3] Portanto, esse é o primeiro registro da espécie para o estado do Mato Grosso, e do iNaturalist. E considerando o comprimento das antenas é um indivíduo fêmea. ————— Figura 1: Padrão das manchas pronotais das espécies N. englemani e M. batesii. Autor: @jcbrilhador, com base nos espécimes do NWCC. ————— Referências 1 - [NWCC-4895](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4895&w=n) 2 - [NWCC-4705](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4705&w=n) 3 - Monné, 2021, pt. I, p. 116.
Occurrence date	2022-04-23 Supplied date "2022-04-23T09:37:00"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	23/04/22 09:37
eventTime	09:37:00-04:00

Taxonomy

scientificName	Mecometopus batesii Supplied scientific name "Mecometopus batesii (White, 1855)"
taxonRank	species
Kingdom	Animalia
Phylum	Arthropoda
class	Insecta
Order	Coleoptera
Family	Cerambycidae
Genus	Mecometopus
Species	Mecometopus batesii
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
acceptedNameUsageID	1148290
taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Mato Grosso
decimalLatitude	Supplied as: "-9.597.604"
decimalLongitude	Supplied as: "-55.931.865"
verbatimLocality	Brazil - MT - Alta Floresta - Cristalino Lodge
coordinatePrecision	Unknown
continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

references	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112612872

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Country inferred from coordinates	Warning
Show/Hide 18 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Mecometopus batesii
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Mecometopus batesii (White, 1855)	Mecometopus batesii
	class	Insecta	Insecta
	acceptedNameUsageID	1148290
	Genus id		133226
	taxonConceptID		259316
	Kingdom id		395634
	Left		291508
	phylum	Arthropoda	Arthropoda
	kingdom	Animalia	Animalia
	Class id		145283
	genus	Mecometopus	Mecometopus
	Phylum id		207912
	order	Coleoptera	Coleoptera
	taxonRank	SPECIES	species
	specificEpithet	batesii
	Order id		111198
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		259316
	Family id		227083
	taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED
	taxonID	1196471
	family	Cerambycidae	Cerambycidae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	Right		291508
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	2022-04-23T09:37:00	2022-04-23
	year	2022	2022
	verbatimEventDate	23/04/22 09:37
	eventTime	09:37:00-04:00
	day	23	23
	month	4	04
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2022-04-24T18:50:57	2022-04-24
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identificationID	252108140
	identificationRemarks	A espécie panamenha apresenta a mancha pronotal preta bilobada posteriormente,<sup>[1]</sup> porém, a mancha do espécime é trilobada anteriormente. Além disso, no espécime apresenta na parte posterior uma pequena mancha diamantiforme, sendo ausente na panamenha. Comparando o espécime com os clitinos do New World Cerambycidae Catalog, deparei com a espécie Mecotopus batesii,<sup>[2]</sup> essa espécie apresenta o mesmo padrão de manchas, e apresenta ocorrência no Brasil (AM, PA, ?RO) e no Peru.<sup>[3]</sup> Portanto, esse é o primeiro registro da espécie para o estado do Mato Grosso, e do iNaturalist. E considerando o comprimento das antenas é um indivíduo fêmea. ————— Figura 1: Padrão das manchas pronotais das espécies N. englemani e M. batesii. <img src="https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/003/841/062/full/Clytini.png?1650827427" alt="Manchas pronotais" width="45%"> Autor: @jcbrilhador, com base nos espécimes do NWCC. ————— Referências 1 - [NWCC-4895](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4895&w=n) 2 - [NWCC-4705](http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=4705&w=n) 3 - Monné, 2021, pt. I, p. 116.
	identifiedBy	Jackson Cordeiro Brilhador
Occurrence	occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112612872
	basisOfRecord	humanObservation	HumanObservation
	recordedBy	Sidnei Dantas	Dantas, S. Sidnei
	sex	FEMALE
	modified	2022-06-14T18:29:13Z	2022-06-14
	Rightsholder	Sidnei Dantas
	datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
	institutionCode	iNaturalist
	lifeStage	Adult
	occurrenceStatus	PRESENT	present
	catalogNumber	112612872
	collectionCode	Observations
Attribution	Data resource		Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
	Data provider uid		dp9
	license	CC_BY_NC_4_0	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr887
	Data partner		iNaturalist
Location	decimalLatitude	-9.597.604
	coordinateUncertaintyInMeters	977.0
	verbatimLocality	Brazil - MT - Alta Floresta - Cristalino Lodge
	country		Brasil
	continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
	stateProvince	Mato Grosso
	decimalLongitude	-55.931.865
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: Observations:112612872

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by