Occurrence record: PMSP:5632

Specimen of Paspalum polyphyllum | Capim-lanoso recorded on 1999-03-18

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Herbário Municipal de São Paulo (PMSP)
institutionCode	Prefeitura de São Paulo Supplied institution code "Prefeitura de São Paulo"
collectionCode	Herbário Municipal de São Paulo Supplied collection code "PMSP"
catalogNumber	5632
occurrenceID	BR:PMSP:5632
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	R.C.Oliveira
Identified date	1998/11
Collector	Affonso, P.\|Garcia, R.J.F. Supplied as "P. Affonso \| R.J.F. Garcia"
recordNumber	368
License	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC-BY-NC
fieldNotes	Erva cespitosa, 40 cm alt., espiguetas com tricomas brancos, flores com anteras marrom-escuras. Muito frequente.
datasetName	Herbário PMSP da Prefeitura de São Paulo
dynamicProperties	{"barcode":"PMSP005632"}
occurrenceRemarks	Área à direita da estrada de entrada.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1998-01-01 Supplied as 1998/11

Event

Occurrence date	1999-03-18
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Paspalum polyphyllum Supplied scientific name "Paspalum polyphyllum Nees"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "esp."
Common name	Capim-lanoso
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Liliopsida
Order	Poales
Family	Poaceae
Genus	Paspalum
Species	Paspalum polyphyllum
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Nees

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	São Paulo
habitat	Supplied as "Campo."
fieldNotes	Erva cespitosa, 40 cm alt., espiguetas com tricomas brancos, flores com anteras marrom-escuras. Muito frequente.
county	São Paulo
municipality	São Paulo

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Identification date before occurrence date	Failed
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 20 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 53 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Paspalum polyphyllum
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	vernacularName		Capim-lanoso
	scientificName	Paspalum polyphyllum Nees	Paspalum polyphyllum
	class		Liliopsida
	Genus id		277431
	taxonConceptID		277628
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		185508
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395637
	genus	Paspalum	Paspalum
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Poales
	taxonRank	esp.	species
	specificEpithet	polyphyllum
	Order id		395684
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		277628
	Family id		364592
	family	POACEAE	Poaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Nees
	Right		185508
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	1999-03-18	1999-03-18
	year		1999
	day		18
	month		03
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	1998/11	1998-01-01
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	R.C.Oliveira
Occurrence	occurrenceID	BR:PMSP:5632
	fieldNotes	Erva cespitosa, 40 cm alt., espiguetas com tricomas brancos, flores com anteras marrom-escuras. Muito frequente.
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	P. Affonso \| R.J.F. Garcia	Affonso, P.\|Garcia, R.J.F.
	modified	2022-12	2022-12
	datasetName	Herbário PMSP da Prefeitura de São Paulo
	recordNumber	368
	institutionCode	Prefeitura de São Paulo
	dynamicProperties	{"barcode":"PMSP005632"}
	occurrenceRemarks	Área à direita da estrada de entrada.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	5632
	collectionCode	PMSP
Attribution	Collection uid		co136
	Data resource		Herbário Municipal de São Paulo (PMSP)
	Institution uid		in65
	Collection name		Herbário Municipal de São Paulo
	Data provider uid		dp5
	Institution name		Prefeitura de São Paulo
	license	CC-BY-NC	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr256
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	county	São Paulo
	habitat	Campo.
	stateProvince	São Paulo
	municipality	São Paulo

Occurrence record: PMSP:5632

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by