Occurrence record: RB:RB01022028

Specimen of Peperomia crinicaulis recorded on 2012-04-18

API

Dataset

Data resource	dr216
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "JBRJ"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "RB"
catalogNumber	RB01022028
otherCatalogNumbers	RB 633591
occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:1022028
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	E.F. Guimarães
Identified date	2015
Collector	C.A. Ferreira Junior; et al
recordNumber	383
license	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	Cerrado. Campo rupestre
Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
occurrenceRemarks	Herbáceo. Espigas vermelhas
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2015

Event

Occurrence date	2012-04-18 Supplied date "18/04/2012"
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Peperomia crinicaulis Supplied scientific name "Peperomia crinicaulis C.DC."
taxonRank	species Supplied as "sp."
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
Class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Piperales
Family	Piperaceae
Genus	Peperomia
Species	Peperomia crinicaulis
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	C.DC.

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Minas Gerais
locality	RPPN Brumas do Espinhaço e Ermo dos Gerais.
minimumElevationInMeters	1341
fieldNotes	Cerrado. Campo rupestre
municipality	Santana do Riacho
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Collector name unparseable	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 18 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Peperomia crinicaulis
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Peperomia crinicaulis C.DC.	Peperomia crinicaulis
	Classs		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		274737
	taxonConceptID		274824
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		70419
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Peperomia	Peperomia
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Piperales
	taxonRank	sp.	species
	specificEpithet	crinicaulis
	Order id		395668
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		274824
	Family id		364584
	family	Piperaceae	Piperaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	C.DC.
	Right		70419
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	18/04/2012	2012-04-18
	year	2012	2012
	day	18	18
	month	04	04
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2015	2015
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	E.F. Guimarães
Occurrence	occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:1022028
	fieldNotes	Cerrado. Campo rupestre
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	C.A. Ferreira Junior; et al
	modified	2017-10-14 03:17:33.583617	2017-10-14
	Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
	datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
	recordNumber	383
	otherCatalogNumbers	RB 633591
	institutionCode	JBRJ
	occurrenceRemarks	Herbáceo. Espigas vermelhas
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	RB01022028
	collectionCode	RB
Attribution	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
Attribution	Data resource uid	dr216
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Minas Gerais
	municipality	Santana do Riacho
	locality	RPPN Brumas do Espinhaço e Ermo dos Gerais.
	countryCode	BR
	minimumElevationInMeters	1341

Occurrence record: RB:RB01022028

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by