Occurrence record: FURB:FURB37971

Specimen of Piper gaudichaudianum | Erva-de-são-manuel recorded on 2003-06-22

API

Dataset

Data partner	Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Data resource	Herbário da Universidade Regional de Blumenau
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "FURB"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "FURB"
catalogNumber	FURB37971
otherCatalogNumbers	FURB 1968
occurrenceID	3557544
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	P.R.F. Amorim
Identified date	11/9/2012
Collector	Rebelo, R.A.\|Rebelo, R.A. Supplied as "Rebelo, R.A.;R.A. Rebelo"
recordNumber	s.n.
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
Rightsholder	FURB
bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=3557544
occurrenceRemarks	Observou-se uma abelha sobre as infrutescências.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	11/9/2012

Event

Occurrence date	2003-06-22 Supplied date "22/6/2003"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	2003-6-22

Taxonomy

scientificName	Piper gaudichaudianum Supplied scientific name "Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Common name	Erva-de-são-manuel
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Piperales
Family	Piperaceae
Genus	Piper
Species	Piper gaudichaudianum
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Kunth

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Santa Catarina
minimumElevationInMeters	1000
municipality	Piratuba
countryCode	BR

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Collection code not recognised	Failed
Institution code not recognised	Failed
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 17 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 55 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Piper gaudichaudianum
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	vernacularName		Erva-de-são-manuel
	scientificName	Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth	Piper gaudichaudianum
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		275140
	taxonConceptID		275296
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		71161
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Piper	Piper
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Piperales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	species
	specificEpithet	gaudichaudianum
	Order id		395668
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		275296
	Family id		364584
	family	Piperaceae	Piperaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Kunth
	Right		71163
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	22/6/2003	2003-06-22
	year	2003	2003
	verbatimEventDate	2003-6-22
	day	22	22
	month	6	06
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	11/9/2012
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	P.R.F. Amorim
Occurrence	occurrenceID	3557544
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Rebelo, R.A.;R.A. Rebelo	Rebelo, R.A.\|Rebelo, R.A.
	Rightsholder	FURB
	recordNumber	s.n.
	otherCatalogNumbers	FURB 1968
	bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=3557544
	institutionCode	FURB
	occurrenceRemarks	Observou-se uma abelha sobre as infrutescências.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	FURB37971
	collectionCode	FURB
Attribution	Data resource		Herbário da Universidade Regional de Blumenau
	Data provider uid		dp28
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr268
	Data partner		Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Santa Catarina
	municipality	Piratuba
	countryCode	BR
	minimumElevationInMeters	1000

Occurrence record: FURB:FURB37971

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by