Occurrence record: RB:RB00118245

Specimen of Swartzia apetala var. apetala | Fruto-de-urubu recorded on 12/1992

API

Dataset

Data resource	dr216
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "JBRJ"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "RB"
catalogNumber	RB00118245
otherCatalogNumbers	RB 329824
occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:118245
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	V.F. Mansano
Identified date	25/9/2006
Collector	Farney, C. Supplied as "C. Farney; et al."
recordNumber	3749
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
occurrenceRemarks	Árvore. Folhas discolores verdes; frutos imaturos verdes.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	25/9/2006

Event

Occurrence date	Year: 1992, Month: 12, Day: Supplied as year:1992 month:12
Date precision	Not Supplied

Taxonomy

scientificName	Swartzia apetala var. apetala Supplied scientific name "Swartzia apetala Raddi var. apetala"
taxonRank	variety Supplied as "var."
Common name	Fruto-de-urubu
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Fabales
Family	Fabaceae Supplied as "Leguminosae"
Genus	Swartzia
Species	Swartzia apetala
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
infraspecificEpithet	apetala

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Rio de Janeiro
locality	Reserva Ecológica Estadual de Jacarepiá. Área em regeneração após pertubação por tratores em 1986. Reserva Ecológica Estadual de Jacarepiá
municipality	Saquarema
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 16 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 58 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the month	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Swartzia apetala
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	vernacularName		Fruto-de-urubu
	scientificName	Swartzia apetala Raddi var. apetala	Swartzia apetala var. apetala
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		302143
	taxonConceptID		319912
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		125734
	infraspecificEpithet	apetala
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Swartzia	Swartzia
	Subspecies id		319912
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Fabales
	taxonRank	var.	variety
	specificEpithet	apetala
	Order id		395724
	Subspecies		Swartzia apetala var. apetala
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		302149
	Family id		364359
	family	Leguminosae	Fabaceae
	Taxon rank id		8010
	Right		125734
Event	Date precision		Not Supplied
	eventDate	12/1992
	year	1992	1992
	month	12	12
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	25/9/2006
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	V.F. Mansano
Occurrence	occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:118245
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	C. Farney; et al.	Farney, C.
	modified	2014-07-22 06:49:57.578799	2014-07-22
	Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
	datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
	recordNumber	3749
	otherCatalogNumbers	RB 329824
	institutionCode	JBRJ
	occurrenceRemarks	Árvore. Folhas discolores verdes; frutos imaturos verdes.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	RB00118245
	collectionCode	RB
Attribution	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
Attribution	Data resource uid	dr216
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Rio de Janeiro
	municipality	Saquarema
	locality	Reserva Ecológica Estadual de Jacarepiá. Área em regeneração após pertubação por tratores em 1986. Reserva Ecológica Estadual de Jacarepiá
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: RB:RB00118245

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by