Occurrence record: Observations:102729912

HumanObservation of Gomesa bifolia | Dancing ladies recorded on 2021-12-08

View original record API

Dataset

Data partner	iNaturalist
Data resource	Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "iNaturalist"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "Observations"
catalogNumber	102729912
occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102729912
basisOfRecord	Human observation Supplied basis "humanObservation"
identifiedBy	Gary Yong Gee
Identified date	2021-12-11T21:04:48
Collector	Cristóvão Crochemore Restrepo
reproductiveCondition	flowering
License	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC_BY_NC_4_0
Rightsholder	Cristóvão Crochemore Restrepo
datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
occurrenceStatus	present Supplied as PRESENT
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2021-12-11 Supplied as 2021-12-11T21:04:48
identificationID	225647581
identificationRemarks	Hi Cristóvão. Gomesa flexuosa does look similar to Gomesa bifolia. The pseudobulbs of Gomesa flexuosa are widely spaced along a creeping rhizome (not shown in your photos). The side lobes are proportionately much smaller, and the midlobe is more kidney-shaped. Königer describes the callus of Gomesa flexuosa "forming at the base an elevated blade, 3-apiculate in front and pubescent above, in front of it on both sides with 2-3 small, distant teeth, the callus in the apical half with 3 short lamellae irregularly gibbous above." References: Baptista, D.H., Harding. P.A. & A. Docha Neto. (2011) Orchids of Brazil – Oncidiinae Part 1. Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana, Brazil. Königer, W. (2004) Oncidium – A Monograph, Vol. I. Verlag Helga Königer, München.

Event

identificationRemarks	Hi Cristóvão. Gomesa flexuosa does look similar to Gomesa bifolia. The pseudobulbs of Gomesa flexuosa are widely spaced along a creeping rhizome (not shown in your photos). The side lobes are proportionately much smaller, and the midlobe is more kidney-shaped. Königer describes the callus of Gomesa flexuosa "forming at the base an elevated blade, 3-apiculate in front and pubescent above, in front of it on both sides with 2-3 small, distant teeth, the callus in the apical half with 3 short lamellae irregularly gibbous above." References: Baptista, D.H., Harding. P.A. & A. Docha Neto. (2011) Orchids of Brazil – Oncidiinae Part 1. Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana, Brazil. Königer, W. (2004) Oncidium – A Monograph, Vol. I. Verlag Helga Königer, München.
Occurrence date	2021-12-08 Supplied date "2021-12-08T16:57:37"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	08/12/21 16:57
eventTime	16:57:37-03:00

Taxonomy

scientificName	Gomesa bifolia Supplied scientific name "Gomesa bifolia (Sims) M.W.Chase & N.H.Williams"
taxonRank	species
Common name	Dancing ladies
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Liliopsida
Order	Asparagales
Family	Orchidaceae
Genus	Gomesa
Species	Gomesa bifolia
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
acceptedNameUsageID	5951177
taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Rio Grande do Sul
decimalLatitude	Supplied as: "-31.522.771"
decimalLongitude	Supplied as: "-52.471.117"
verbatimLocality	Quilombo
coordinatePrecision	Unknown
continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

references	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102729912

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Country inferred from coordinates	Warning
Show/Hide 18 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Gomesa bifolia
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	vernacularName		Dancing ladies
	scientificName	Gomesa bifolia (Sims) M.W.Chase & N.H.Williams	Gomesa bifolia
	class	Liliopsida	Liliopsida
	acceptedNameUsageID	5951177
	Genus id		344005
	taxonConceptID		384494
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		149927
	phylum	Tracheophyta	Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395637
	genus	Gomesa	Gomesa
	Phylum id		395631
	order	Asparagales	Asparagales
	taxonRank	SPECIES	species
	specificEpithet	bifolia
	Order id		395645
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		384494
	Family id		364551
	taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED
	taxonID	544063
	family	Orchidaceae	Orchidaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	Right		149927
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	2021-12-08T16:57:37	2021-12-08
	year	2021	2021
	verbatimEventDate	08/12/21 16:57
	eventTime	16:57:37-03:00
	day	8	8
	month	12	12
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2021-12-11T21:04:48	2021-12-11
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identificationID	225647581
	identificationRemarks	Hi Cristóvão. Gomesa flexuosa does look similar to Gomesa bifolia. The pseudobulbs of Gomesa flexuosa are widely spaced along a creeping rhizome (not shown in your photos). The side lobes are proportionately much smaller, and the midlobe is more kidney-shaped. Königer describes the callus of Gomesa flexuosa "forming at the base an elevated blade, 3-apiculate in front and pubescent above, in front of it on both sides with 2-3 small, distant teeth, the callus in the apical half with 3 short lamellae irregularly gibbous above." References: Baptista, D.H., Harding. P.A. & A. Docha Neto. (2011) Orchids of Brazil – Oncidiinae Part 1. Associação Orquidófila Piracicabana, Brazil. Königer, W. (2004) Oncidium – A Monograph, Vol. I. Verlag Helga Königer, München.
	identifiedBy	Gary Yong Gee
Occurrence	occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102729912
	basisOfRecord	humanObservation	HumanObservation
	recordedBy	Cristóvão Crochemore Restrepo	Cristóvão Crochemore Restrepo
	modified	2022-02-06T20:40:10Z	2022-02-06
	Rightsholder	Cristóvão Crochemore Restrepo
	datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
	institutionCode	iNaturalist
	occurrenceStatus	PRESENT	present
	reproductiveCondition	flowering
	catalogNumber	102729912
	collectionCode	Observations
Attribution	Data resource		Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
	Data provider uid		dp9
	license	CC_BY_NC_4_0	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr887
	Data partner		iNaturalist
Location	decimalLatitude	-31.522.771
	coordinateUncertaintyInMeters	1849.0
	verbatimLocality	Quilombo
	country		Brasil
	continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
	stateProvince	Rio Grande do Sul
	decimalLongitude	-52.471.117
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: Observations:102729912

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by