Occurrence record: K:K000909040

Specimen of Fabaceae recorded on 1959-04-01

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	K herbarium - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - Herbário Virtual REFLORA
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "K"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "K"
catalogNumber	K000909040
occurrenceID	634936
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	Administrador
Identified date	12/05/17
Collector	Duarte, A.P. Supplied as "A.P. Duarte;et al.,Duarte, A.P."
recordNumber	4675
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	√Årvore de flores cremes, perfumadas
Rightsholder	K
bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=634936
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2017-05-12 Supplied as 12/05/17

Event

Occurrence date	1959-04-01 Supplied date "01/04/59"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	01/04/59

Taxonomy

scientificName	Fabaceae Supplied scientific name "Fabaceae Dalbergia foliolosa Benth."
taxonRank	family Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Fabales
Family	Fabaceae
Genus	Dalbergia
Species	Dalbergia foliolosa
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Higher taxon match The match is based on the higher level classification.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Benth.

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Rio de Janeiro
locality	Serra de Petr√≥polis, variante Nova.
fieldNotes	√Årvore de flores cremes, perfumadas
municipality	Petr√≥polis
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
First of the month	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the year	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 55 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Name match metric		higherMatch
	scientificName	Fabaceae Dalbergia foliolosa Benth.	Fabaceae
	class		Magnoliopsida
	taxonConceptID		364359
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		115461
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Dalbergia
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Fabales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	family
	specificEpithet	foliolosa
	Order id		395724
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Family id		364359
	family	Fabaceae	Fabaceae
	Taxon rank id		5000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Benth.
	Right		128207
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	01/04/59	1959-04-01
	year	1959	1959
	verbatimEventDate	01/04/59
	day	1	1
	month	4	04
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	12/05/17	2017-05-12
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	Administrador
Occurrence	occurrenceID	634936
	fieldNotes	√Årvore de flores cremes, perfumadas
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	A.P. Duarte;et al.,Duarte, A.P.	Duarte, A.P.
	Rightsholder	K
	recordNumber	4675
	bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=634936
	institutionCode	K
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	K000909040
	collectionCode	K
Attribution	Data resource		K herbarium - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - Herbário Virtual REFLORA
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr233
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Rio de Janeiro
	municipality	Petr√≥polis
	locality	Serra de Petr√≥polis, variante Nova.
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: K:K000909040

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by