Occurrence record: HUFU:52758

Specimen of Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum recorded on 2008-09-23

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Herbário Uberlandense
institutionCode	Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Supplied institution code "UFU"
collectionCode	Herbário Uberlandense Supplied collection code "HUFU"
catalogNumber	52758
occurrenceID	Br:UFU:HUFU_52758_50684
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen Supplied basis "preservedSpecimen"
identifiedBy	Semir, J.; Monge, M.
Identified date	2013-06
Collector	Mello, F.N.A.\|Junqueira, T.V. Supplied as "Mello, F.N.A.; Junqueira, T.V.; Morais, T.M. & Yamagishi-Costa, J."
recordNumber	362
License	CC-BY-NC
fieldNotes	Arbusto, ca. 1,5 m. Brácteas involucrais verdes, flores lilás, botões com tricomas branco.
occurrenceRemarks	Arbusto, ca. 1,5 m. Brácteas involucrais verdes, flores lilás, botões com tricomas branco.; Campo rupestre.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2013-06

Event

Occurrence date	2008-09-23 Supplied as year:2008 month:9 day:23
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum
taxonRank	species Supplied as "espécie"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Asterales
Family	Asteraceae
Genus	Lychnophoriopsis
Species	Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	(Sch.Bip.) H.Rob.

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Minas Gerais
locality	Estrada Diamantina - Curvelo, Cerca de 15 km de Gouveia.
habitat	Supplied as "Campo rupestre."
fieldNotes	Arbusto, ca. 1,5 m. Brácteas involucrais verdes, flores lilás, botões com tricomas branco.
county	Diamantina

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 22 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 53 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum	Lychnophoriopsis candelabrum
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		307988
	taxonConceptID		307991
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		74012
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Lychnophoriopsis	Lychnophoriopsis
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Asterales
	taxonRank	espécie	species
	specificEpithet	candelabrum
	Order id		395671
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		307991
	Family id		364204
	family	Asteraceae	Asteraceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	(Sch.Bip.) H.Rob.
	Right		74012
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	2008-09-23	2008-09-23
	year	2008	2008
	day	23	23
	month	9	09
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2013-06	2013-06
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	Semir, J.; Monge, M.
Occurrence	occurrenceID	Br:UFU:HUFU_52758_50684
	fieldNotes	Arbusto, ca. 1,5 m. Brácteas involucrais verdes, flores lilás, botões com tricomas branco.
	basisOfRecord	preservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Mello, F.N.A.; Junqueira, T.V.; Morais, T.M. & Yamagishi-Costa, J.	Mello, F.N.A.\|Junqueira, T.V.
	modified	30/06/2022	2022-06-30
	recordNumber	362
	institutionCode	UFU
	occurrenceRemarks	Arbusto, ca. 1,5 m. Brácteas involucrais verdes, flores lilás, botões com tricomas branco.; Campo rupestre.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	52758
	collectionCode	HUFU
Attribution	Collection uid		co141
	Data resource		Herbário Uberlandense
	Institution uid		in68
	Collection name		Herbário Uberlandense
	Data provider uid		dp5
	Institution name		Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
	license		CC-BY-NC
	Data resource uid	dr262
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	county	Diamantina
	habitat	Campo rupestre.
	stateProvince	Minas Gerais
	locality	Estrada Diamantina - Curvelo, Cerca de 15 km de Gouveia.

Occurrence record: HUFU:52758

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by