Occurrence record: S:S15-60545

Specimen of Miconia chamissois recorded on 1964-07-29

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - S herbarium - Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet - Reflora
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "S"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "S"
catalogNumber	S15-60545
occurrenceID	5002280
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	J. J. Wurdack
Identified date	1965
Collector	Prance, G.T.\|Silva, N.T. Supplied as "G. T. Prance;N. T. Silva"
recordNumber	58463
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	Beside small stream
Rightsholder	S
bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=5002280
occurrenceRemarks	Shrub, 1,5 m. tall, flowers white, common
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1965

Event

Occurrence date	1964-07-29 Supplied date "29/7/1964"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	29/7/1964

Taxonomy

scientificName	Miconia chamissois Supplied scientific name "Miconia chamissois Naudin"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Myrtales
Family	Melastomataceae
Genus	Miconia
Species	Miconia chamissois
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Naudin

Geospatial

Country	Brazil
State or Territory	Goiás
locality	Exploration of New Brazilian Highways, Northern Goiás, 2-6 km. north of Miracema do Norte
fieldNotes	Beside small stream
countryCode	BR

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Miconia chamissois
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Miconia chamissois Naudin	Miconia chamissois
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		338241
	taxonConceptID		338289
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		99919
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Miconia	Miconia
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Myrtales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	species
	specificEpithet	chamissois
	Order id		395701
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		338289
	Family id		364495
	family	Melastomataceae	Melastomataceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Naudin
	Right		99919
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	29/7/1964	1964-07-29
	year	1964	1964
	verbatimEventDate	29/7/1964
	day	29	29
	month	7	07
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	1965	1965
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	J. J. Wurdack
Occurrence	occurrenceID	5002280
	fieldNotes	Beside small stream
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	G. T. Prance;N. T. Silva	Prance, G.T.\|Silva, N.T.
	Rightsholder	S
	recordNumber	58463
	bibliographicCitation	Herbário Virtual REFLORA Disponível em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=5002280
	institutionCode	S
	occurrenceRemarks	Shrub, 1,5 m. tall, flowers white, common
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	S15-60545
	collectionCode	S
Attribution	Data resource		Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - S herbarium - Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet - Reflora
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr460
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brazil	Brazil
	stateProvince	Goiás
	locality	Exploration of New Brazilian Highways, Northern Goiás, 2-6 km. north of Miracema do Norte
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: S:S15-60545

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by