Occurrence record: SPF:185820

Specimen of Niedenzuella acutifolia recorded on 00/11/2005

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Herbário da Universidade de São Paulo (SPF)
institutionCode	Universidade de São Paulo Supplied institution code "USP"
collectionCode	Herbário da Universidade de São Paulo Supplied collection code "SPF"
catalogNumber	185820
occurrenceID	102439
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	Almeida, RF
Identified date	May-13
Collector	Garcia, P. Po Supplied as "Garcia, PO"
recordNumber	s.n.
fieldNotes	Cipó, no interior da mata a aproximadamente 8 m de alt., com flores vistosas de cor amarela. Freqüente.
dynamicProperties	{"barcode": "SPF00185820" }
occurrenceRemarks	Cipó, no interior da mata a aproximadamente 8 m de alt., com flores vistosas de cor amarela. Freqüente.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	May-13

Event

Occurrence date	Year: 2005, Month: 11, Day: Supplied as year:2005 month:11 day:0
Date precision	Not Supplied

Taxonomy

scientificName	Niedenzuella acutifolia Supplied scientific name "Niedenzuella acutifolia (Cav.) W.R.Anderson"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "sp."
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Malpighiales
Family	Malpighiaceae
Genus	Niedenzuella
Species	Niedenzuella acutifolia
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	(Cav.) W.R.Anderson

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Minas Gerais
locality	Reserva Biológica Municipal de Santa Cândida
minimumElevationInMeters	-9999
maximumElevationInMeters	0
fieldNotes	Cipó, no interior da mata a aproximadamente 8 m de alt., com flores vistosas de cor amarela. Freqüente.
county	Juiz de Fora

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Invalid collection date	Failed
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Min and max altitude reversed	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 54 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the month	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Niedenzuella acutifolia
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Niedenzuella acutifolia (Cav.) W.R.Anderson	Niedenzuella acutifolia
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		336063
	taxonConceptID		336065
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		32685
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Niedenzuella	Niedenzuella
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Malpighiales
	taxonRank	sp.	species
	specificEpithet	acutifolia
	Order id		395635
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		336065
	Family id		364476
	family	Malpighiaceae	Malpighiaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	(Cav.) W.R.Anderson
	Right		32685
Event	Date precision		Not Supplied
	eventDate	00/11/2005
	year	2005	2005
	day	0
	month	11	11
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	May-13
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	Almeida, RF
Occurrence	occurrenceID	102439
	fieldNotes	Cipó, no interior da mata a aproximadamente 8 m de alt., com flores vistosas de cor amarela. Freqüente.
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Garcia, PO	Garcia, P. Po
	recordNumber	s.n.
	institutionCode	USP
	dynamicProperties	{"barcode": "SPF00185820" }
	occurrenceRemarks	Cipó, no interior da mata a aproximadamente 8 m de alt., com flores vistosas de cor amarela. Freqüente.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	185820
	collectionCode	SPF
Attribution	Collection uid		co138
	Data resource		Herbário da Universidade de São Paulo (SPF)
	Institution uid		in3
	Collection name		Herbário da Universidade de São Paulo
	Data provider uid		dp5
	Institution name		Universidade de São Paulo
	Data resource uid	dr258
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	county	Juiz de Fora
	stateProvince	Minas Gerais
	locality	Reserva Biológica Municipal de Santa Cândida
	minimumElevationInMeters	-9999	-9999.0
	maximumElevationInMeters	0	0.0

Occurrence record: SPF:185820

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by