Occurrence record: P:P00541508

Specimen of Diplazium recorded on --/10/1912

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Museu de História Natural de Paris
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "MNHN"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "P"
catalogNumber	P00541508
occurrenceID	4196502
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	Stolze
Identified date	1989
Collector	Buchtien;
recordNumber	3390
typeStatus	ISOTYPUS
license	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
Rightsholder	P
bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=4196502
occurrenceRemarks	Pr√©l√®vt de spores r√©alis√© pour C. Mynssen, Jardim Bot√¢nico do Rio de Janeiro Br√©sil, D√©cembre 2013 ‚Äì Demande colhelper n¬∞22049
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1989

Event

Occurrence date	Year: 1912, Month: 10, Day: Supplied as year:1912 month:10
Date precision	Not Supplied
verbatimEventDate	10-1912/-

Taxonomy

scientificName	Diplazium Supplied scientific name "Pteridophyta Diplazium cuneifolium Rosenst."
taxonRank	genus Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
Class	Polypodiopsida
Order	Polypodiales
Family	Athyriaceae Supplied as "Pteridophyta"
Genus	Diplazium
Species	Diplazium cuneifolium
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Higher taxon match The match is based on the higher level classification.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Rosenst.

Geospatial

Country	Bolivie
locality	Polo-Polo pr√®s Coroico, North Yungas
minimumElevationInMeters	1100

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Type status not recognised	Failed
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 16 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 57 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the month	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Name match metric		higherMatch
	scientificName	Pteridophyta Diplazium cuneifolium Rosenst.	Diplazium
	Classs		Polypodiopsida
	Genus id		350666
	taxonConceptID		350666
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		195840
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395652
	genus	Diplazium	Diplazium
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Polypodiales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	genus
	specificEpithet	cuneifolium
	Order id		395670
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Family id		291182
	family	Pteridophyta	Athyriaceae
	Taxon rank id		6000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Rosenst.
	Right		195950
Event	Date precision		Not Supplied
	eventDate	--/10/1912
	year	1912	1912
	verbatimEventDate	10-1912/-
	month	10	10
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	1989	1989
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	typeStatus	ISOTYPUS
	identifiedBy	Stolze
Occurrence	occurrenceID	4196502
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Buchtien;	Buchtien;
	Rightsholder	P
	recordNumber	3390
	bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=4196502
	institutionCode	MNHN
	occurrenceRemarks	Pr√©l√®vt de spores r√©alis√© pour C. Mynssen, Jardim Bot√¢nico do Rio de Janeiro Br√©sil, D√©cembre 2013 ‚Äì Demande colhelper n¬∞22049
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	P00541508
	collectionCode	P
Attribution	Data resource		Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Museu de História Natural de Paris
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr234
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Bolivie
	locality	Polo-Polo pr√®s Coroico, North Yungas
	minimumElevationInMeters	1100

Occurrence record: P:P00541508

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by