Occurrence record: K:K000807502

Specimen of Podostemaceae recorded on 1928-08-01

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	K herbarium - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - Herbário Virtual REFLORA
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "K"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "K"
catalogNumber	K000807502
occurrenceID	801064
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	P. van Royen
Identified date	15/09/50
Collector	;Tate, G.H.H.,G.H.H. Tate
recordNumber	126
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	leaves below water, alga-like; flowers 2 inches above water level; seeds above that on bare rock
Rightsholder	K
bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=801064
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1950-09-15 Supplied as 15/09/50

Event

Occurrence date	1928-08-01 Supplied date "--/8/1928 at√© --/4/1929"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	1928-08

Taxonomy

scientificName	Podostemaceae Supplied scientific name "Podostemaceae Rhyncholacis linearis Tul."
taxonRank	family Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Malpighiales
Family	Podostemaceae
Genus	Rhyncholacis
Species	Rhyncholacis linearis
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Higher taxon match The match is based on the higher level classification.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Tul.

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Amazonas
locality	Rio Negro.
fieldNotes	leaves below water, alga-like; flowers 2 inches above water level; seeds above that on bare rock
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Collector name unparseable	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 17 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Name match metric		higherMatch
	scientificName	Podostemaceae Rhyncholacis linearis Tul.	Podostemaceae
	class		Magnoliopsida
	taxonConceptID		364595
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		34943
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Rhyncholacis
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Malpighiales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	family
	specificEpithet	linearis
	Order id		395635
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Family id		364595
	family	Podostemaceae	Podostemaceae
	Taxon rank id		5000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Tul.
	Right		35311
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	--/8/1928 at√© --/4/1929	1928-08-01
	year	1928	1928
	verbatimEventDate	1928-08
	month	8	08
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	15/09/50	1950-09-15
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	P. van Royen
Occurrence	occurrenceID	801064
	fieldNotes	leaves below water, alga-like; flowers 2 inches above water level; seeds above that on bare rock
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	;Tate, G.H.H.,G.H.H. Tate
	Rightsholder	K
	recordNumber	126
	bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=801064
	institutionCode	K
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	K000807502
	collectionCode	K
Attribution	Data resource		K herbarium - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Amostras Brasileiras Repatriadas - Herbário Virtual REFLORA
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr233
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Amazonas
	locality	Rio Negro.
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: K:K000807502

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by