Occurrence record: IAN:95906

Specimen of Ecclinusa lancifolia recorded on 00/12/1851

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Embrapa Amazônia Oriental - Instituto Agronômico do Norte (Herbário IAN)
institutionCode	Instituto Agronômico do Norte Supplied institution code "IAN"
collectionCode	Herbário do Instituto Agronômico Norte Supplied collection code "IAN"
catalogNumber	95906
occurrenceID	178292
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	Pennington, TD
Identified date	1990
Collector	Spruce, R. R Supplied as "Spruce, R"
recordNumber	1949
typeStatus	isotipo
License	CC-BY-NC
fieldNotes	PENNINGTON (1990:639) citou: "Type. Brazil. Amazonas: R. Negro, betw. Barcelos & San Isabel, above Barraroa, Dec 1851 (fl), Spruce 1949 (isotypes, BM, BR, F, GH, GOET, K, NY, W)."
dynamicProperties	{"barcode": "IAN095906" }
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1990

Event

Occurrence date	Year: 1851, Month: 12, Day: Supplied as year:1851 month:12
Date precision	Not Supplied

Taxonomy

scientificName	Ecclinusa lancifolia Supplied scientific name "Ecclinusa lancifolia (Mart. & Eichler) Eyma"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "sp."
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta Supplied as "Dicotiledônea"
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Ericales
Family	Sapotaceae
Genus	Ecclinusa
Species	Ecclinusa lancifolia
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	(Mart. & Eichler) Eyma

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Amazonas
locality	Rio Negro, entre Barcelos e Santa Izabel.
fieldNotes	PENNINGTON (1990:639) citou: "Type. Brazil. Amazonas: R. Negro, betw. Barcelos & San Isabel, above Barraroa, Dec 1851 (fl), Spruce 1949 (isotypes, BM, BR, F, GH, GOET, K, NY, W)."
continent	Southern America

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Type status not recognised	Failed
Incomplete collection date	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 54 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the month	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Ecclinusa lancifolia
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Ecclinusa lancifolia (Mart. & Eichler) Eyma	Ecclinusa lancifolia
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		280789
	taxonConceptID		368230
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		84543
	phylum	Dicotiledônea	Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Ecclinusa	Ecclinusa
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Ericales
	taxonRank	sp.	species
	specificEpithet	lancifolia
	Order id		395678
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		368230
	Family id		364662
	family	Sapotaceae	Sapotaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	(Mart. & Eichler) Eyma
	Right		84543
Event	Date precision		Not Supplied
	eventDate	00/12/1851
	year	1851	1851
	month	12	12
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	1990	1990
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	typeStatus	isotipo
	identifiedBy	Pennington, TD
Occurrence	occurrenceID	178292
	fieldNotes	PENNINGTON (1990:639) citou: "Type. Brazil. Amazonas: R. Negro, betw. Barcelos & San Isabel, above Barraroa, Dec 1851 (fl), Spruce 1949 (isotypes, BM, BR, F, GH, GOET, K, NY, W)."
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Spruce, R	Spruce, R. R
	modified	01/09/2021	2021-09-01
	recordNumber	1949
	institutionCode	IAN
	dynamicProperties	{"barcode": "IAN095906" }
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	95906
	collectionCode	IAN
Attribution	Collection uid		co74
	Data resource		Embrapa Amazônia Oriental - Instituto Agronômico do Norte (Herbário IAN)
	Institution uid		in28
	Collection name		Herbário do Instituto Agronômico Norte
	Data provider uid		dp5
	Institution name		Instituto Agronômico do Norte
	license		CC-BY-NC
	Data resource uid	dr246
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	continent	Southern America
	stateProvince	Amazonas
	locality	Rio Negro, entre Barcelos e Santa Izabel.

Occurrence record: IAN:95906

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by