Occurrence record: FURB:RBR00001982

Specimen of Bomarea edulis | Bico de nambu recorded on 1985-01-08

API

Dataset

Data partner	Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Data resource	Herbário da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "FURB"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "FURB"
catalogNumber	RBR00001982
otherCatalogNumbers	RBR 1982
occurrenceID	RBR00001982
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	R.S. Candido
Identified date	17/4/2008
Collector	Gentry, A.\|Zardini, E. Supplied as "A. Gentry; E. Zardini"
recordNumber	49332
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
Rightsholder	Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
datasetName	RBR - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
occurrenceRemarks	Vine, flowers pink outside, cream with maroon dots inside.
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	17/4/2008

Event

Occurrence date	1985-01-08 Supplied date "1985-1-8"
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Bomarea edulis Supplied scientific name "Bomarea edulis (Tussac) Herb."
taxonRank	species Supplied as "specie"
Common name	Bico de nambu
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Liliopsida
Order	Liliales
Family	Alstroemeriaceae
Genus	Bomarea
Species	Bomarea edulis
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	(Tussac) Herb.

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	São Paulo
locality	Agriculture Experiment Station, Alt. 100m, 23°30´S, 45°W. Forest along Rio Comprido.
geodeticDatum	EPSG:4326
minimumElevationInMeters	-9999
maximumElevationInMeters	0
municipality	Ubatuba
countryCode	BR
verbatimLongitude	0
verbatimLatitude	0

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Collection code not recognised	Failed
Institution code not recognised	Failed
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Warning
Supplied coordinates are zero	Warning
Zero latitude	Warning
Zero longitude	Warning
Show/Hide 25 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Passed
Min and max altitude reversed	Passed
Coordinates are transposed	Passed
Coordinates are out of range for species	Passed
Supplied country not recognised	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Missing geodetic datum	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing coordinate precision	Missing
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 43 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Bomarea edulis
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	vernacularName		Bico de nambu
	scientificName	Bomarea edulis (Tussac) Herb.	Bomarea edulis
	class		Liliopsida
	Genus id		369593
	taxonConceptID		369596
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		135535
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395637
	genus	Bomarea	Bomarea
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Liliales
	taxonRank	specie	species
	specificEpithet	edulis
	Order id		395644
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		369596
	Family id		364163
	family	ALSTROEMERIACEAE	Alstroemeriaceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	(Tussac) Herb.
	Right		135545
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	1985-1-8	1985-01-08
	year	1985	1985
	day	8	8
	month	1	01
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	17/4/2008
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	R.S. Candido
Occurrence	occurrenceID	RBR00001982
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	A. Gentry; E. Zardini	Gentry, A.\|Zardini, E.
	Rightsholder	Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
	datasetName	RBR - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
	recordNumber	49332
	otherCatalogNumbers	RBR 1982
	institutionCode	FURB
	occurrenceRemarks	Vine, flowers pink outside, cream with maroon dots inside.
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	RBR00001982
	collectionCode	FURB
Attribution	Data resource		Herbário da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
	Data provider uid		dp28
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr469
	Data partner		Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	São Paulo
	municipality	Ubatuba
	locality	Agriculture Experiment Station, Alt. 100m, 23°30´S, 45°W. Forest along Rio Comprido.
	geodeticDatum		EPSG:4326
	countryCode	BR
	minimumElevationInMeters	-9999	-9999.0
	verbatimLongitude	0
	maximumElevationInMeters	0	0.0
	verbatimLatitude	0

Occurrence record: FURB:RBR00001982

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by