Occurrence record: Observations:35701616

HumanObservation of Leptodon forbesi | Gavião-de-pescoço-branco recorded on 2019-11-05

View original record API

Dataset

Data partner	iNaturalist
Data resource	Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "iNaturalist"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "Observations"
catalogNumber	35701616
occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35701616
basisOfRecord	Human observation Supplied basis "humanObservation"
identifiedBy	Valia Pavlou
Identified date	2019-11-15T21:04:04
Collector	P, B. Ben Supplied as "Ben P"
License	CC0 Supplied as CC0_1_0
Rightsholder	Ben P
datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
informationWithheld	Coordinate uncertainty increased to 31245m to protect threatened taxon
occurrenceStatus	present Supplied as PRESENT
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	2019-11-15 Supplied as 2019-11-15T21:04:04
identificationID	77839854
identificationRemarks	After much investigation and reviewing the secondaries and secondary coverts of every single raptor that occurs in that area (adults and juveniles), i’ve reached the conclusion that those feathers are from an adult white-collared kite, even though i’m aware that they’re critically endangered and it would be highly unlikely for anyone to find one of their feathers. All other raptors can be ruled out individually based on different feather traits (like having thicker and paler anterior vane bars / no anterior vane bars at all or more posterior vane bars, having lighter posterior vanes in general, not having any wingbars, not having white outlines around their wingbars, having black feather tips, having different greater secondary wing coverts, more rufous feathers, etc). The best reference picture for the secondaries of this species is https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8a/30/c0/8a30c0951f6cc774def7a161e6bee6c3.jpg . If you had any other species in mind, tell me so that i explain why i ruled them out. It would take too long to explain how i ruled out every single species since there’s two dozens of them

Event

identificationRemarks	After much investigation and reviewing the secondaries and secondary coverts of every single raptor that occurs in that area (adults and juveniles), i’ve reached the conclusion that those feathers are from an adult white-collared kite, even though i’m aware that they’re critically endangered and it would be highly unlikely for anyone to find one of their feathers. All other raptors can be ruled out individually based on different feather traits (like having thicker and paler anterior vane bars / no anterior vane bars at all or more posterior vane bars, having lighter posterior vanes in general, not having any wingbars, not having white outlines around their wingbars, having black feather tips, having different greater secondary wing coverts, more rufous feathers, etc). The best reference picture for the secondaries of this species is https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8a/30/c0/8a30c0951f6cc774def7a161e6bee6c3.jpg . If you had any other species in mind, tell me so that i explain why i ruled them out. It would take too long to explain how i ruled out every single species since there’s two dozens of them
Occurrence date	2019-11-05 Supplied date "2019-11-05T11:25:00"
Date precision	Day
verbatimEventDate	05/11/19 11:25
eventTime	11:25:00-02:00

Taxonomy

scientificName	Leptodon forbesi Supplied scientific name "Leptodon forbesi (Swann, 1922)"
taxonRank	species
Common name	Gavião-de-pescoço-branco
Kingdom	Animalia
Phylum	Chordata
class	Aves
Order	Accipitriformes
Family	Accipitridae
Genus	Leptodon
Species	Leptodon forbesi
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Canonical name match The supplied name was parsed into canonical form before a match was found.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
acceptedNameUsageID	5229196
taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Alagoas
decimalLatitude	Supplied as: "-921.099"
decimalLongitude	Supplied as: "-3.594.181"
verbatimLocality	Alagoas, BR
coordinatePrecision	Unknown
continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

references	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35701616

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Country inferred from coordinates	Warning
Show/Hide 18 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 10 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Location not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 56 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Leptodon forbesi
	Name match metric		canonicalMatch
	vernacularName		Gavião-de-pescoço-branco
	scientificName	Leptodon forbesi (Swann, 1922)	Leptodon forbesi
	class	Aves	Aves
	acceptedNameUsageID	5229196
	Genus id		178802
	taxonConceptID		113768
	Kingdom id		395634
	Left		513587
	phylum	Chordata	Chordata
	kingdom	Animalia	Animalia
	Class id		145307
	genus	Leptodon	Leptodon
	Phylum id		239567
	order	Accipitriformes	Accipitriformes
	taxonRank	SPECIES	species
	specificEpithet	forbesi
	Order id		239749
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		113768
	Family id		178807
	taxonomicStatus	ACCEPTED
	taxonID	5284
	family	Accipitridae	Accipitridae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	Right		513587
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	2019-11-05T11:25:00	2019-11-05
	year	2019	2019
	verbatimEventDate	05/11/19 11:25
	eventTime	11:25:00-02:00
	day	5	5
	month	11	11
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	2019-11-15T21:04:04	2019-11-15
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identificationID	77839854
	identificationRemarks	After much investigation and reviewing the secondaries and secondary coverts of every single raptor that occurs in that area (adults and juveniles), i’ve reached the conclusion that those feathers are from an adult white-collared kite, even though i’m aware that they’re critically endangered and it would be highly unlikely for anyone to find one of their feathers. All other raptors can be ruled out individually based on different feather traits (like having thicker and paler anterior vane bars / no anterior vane bars at all or more posterior vane bars, having lighter posterior vanes in general, not having any wingbars, not having white outlines around their wingbars, having black feather tips, having different greater secondary wing coverts, more rufous feathers, etc). The best reference picture for the secondaries of this species is https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8a/30/c0/8a30c0951f6cc774def7a161e6bee6c3.jpg . If you had any other species in mind, tell me so that i explain why i ruled them out. It would take too long to explain how i ruled out every single species since there’s two dozens of them
	identifiedBy	Valia Pavlou
Occurrence	occurrenceID	https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35701616
	basisOfRecord	humanObservation	HumanObservation
	recordedBy	Ben P	P, B. Ben
	modified	2020-06-15T18:09:12Z	2020-06-15
	Rightsholder	Ben P
	datasetName	iNaturalist research-grade observations
	informationWithheld	Coordinate uncertainty increased to 31245m to protect threatened taxon
	institutionCode	iNaturalist
	occurrenceStatus	PRESENT	present
	catalogNumber	35701616
	collectionCode	Observations
Attribution	Data resource		Observações do iNaturalist para o Brasil
	Data provider uid		dp9
	license	CC0_1_0	CC0
	Data resource uid	dr887
	Data partner		iNaturalist
Location	decimalLatitude	-921.099
	coordinateUncertaintyInMeters	31245.0
	verbatimLocality	Alagoas, BR
	country		Brasil
	continent	SOUTH_AMERICA
	stateProvince	Alagoas
	decimalLongitude	-3.594.181
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: Observations:35701616

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by