Occurrence record: FURB:COR00004121

Specimen of Aspilia leucoglossa recorded on 2012-11-04

API

Dataset

Data partner	Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Data resource	COR - Herbário da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "FURB"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "FURB"
catalogNumber	COR00004121
otherCatalogNumbers	COR 15760
occurrenceID	COR00004121
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	Mendes, D.M.
Identified date	6/1/2023
Collector	Scatigna, A.V.\|Barbosa, T.D.M.\|Carmo, J.A.M.\|Galvão, J.C. Supplied as "Scatigna, A.V.; Barbosa, T.D.M.; Carmo, J.A.M.; Galvão, J.C."
recordNumber	285
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	Campo cerrado.
Rightsholder	Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Pantanal
datasetName	COR - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Pantanal
occurrenceRemarks	Flores brancas Habito: Subarbusto
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	6/1/2023

Event

Occurrence date	2012-11-04 Supplied as year:2012 month:11 day:04
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Aspilia leucoglossa Supplied scientific name "Aspilia leucoglossa Malme"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "specie"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Asterales
Family	Asteraceae
Genus	Aspilia
Species	Aspilia leucoglossa
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Malme

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Mato Grosso do Sul
locality	Balneário Paraíso
fieldNotes	Campo cerrado.
municipality	Rio Verde do Mato Grosso

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Collection code not recognised	Failed
Institution code not recognised	Failed
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 54 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Aspilia leucoglossa
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Aspilia leucoglossa Malme	Aspilia leucoglossa
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		284805
	taxonConceptID		311829
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		77312
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Aspilia	Aspilia
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Asterales
	taxonRank	specie	species
	specificEpithet	leucoglossa
	Order id		395671
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		311829
	Family id		364204
	family	ASTERACEAE	Asteraceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Malme
	Right		77312
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	2012-11-04	2012-11-04
	year	2012	2012
	day	04	4
	month	11	11
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	6/1/2023
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	Mendes, D.M.
Occurrence	occurrenceID	COR00004121
	fieldNotes	Campo cerrado.
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	Scatigna, A.V.; Barbosa, T.D.M.; Carmo, J.A.M.; Galvão, J.C.	Scatigna, A.V.\|Barbosa, T.D.M.\|Carmo, J.A.M.\|Galvão, J.C.
	Rightsholder	Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Pantanal
	datasetName	COR - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Pantanal
	recordNumber	285
	otherCatalogNumbers	COR 15760
	institutionCode	FURB
	occurrenceRemarks	Flores brancas Habito: Subarbusto
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	COR00004121
	collectionCode	FURB
Attribution	Data resource		COR - Herbário da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
	Data provider uid		dp28
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr248
	Data partner		Sistema de Gerenciamento de Coleções Botânicas - JABOT
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Mato Grosso do Sul
	municipality	Rio Verde do Mato Grosso
	locality	Balneário Paraíso

Occurrence record: FURB:COR00004121

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by