Occurrence record: MO:MO1665831

Specimen of Fabaceae recorded on 1987-08-26

API

Dataset

Data partner	Programa Reflora/CNPq
Data resource	Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Jardim Botânico de Missouri
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "MO"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "MO"
catalogNumber	MO1665831
occurrenceID	3540350
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	J. Grimes,
Identified date	1997
Collector	C.A. Cid Ferreira;
recordNumber	9229
typeStatus	TYPUS
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
Rightsholder	MO
bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=3540350
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	1997
identificationRemarks	specimen

Event

identificationRemarks	specimen
Occurrence date	1987-08-26 Supplied date "26/08/87"
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Fabaceae Supplied scientific name "Fabaceae Dioclea fimbriata Huber"
taxonRank	family Supplied as "ESPECIE"
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Fabales
Family	Fabaceae
Genus	Dioclea
Species	Dioclea fimbriata
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Higher taxon match The match is based on the higher level classification.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Huber

Geospatial

Country	Brasil Supplied as "Brazil"
State or Territory	Amazonas
locality	Mun. S√£o Luiz do Anau√°, Roraima. Estrada Perimetral Norte (BR-210), 02 km da cidade de S√£o Luiz. Afloramento rochosao.
decimalLatitude	Supplied as: "108.330.555.555.555.000"
decimalLongitude	Supplied as: "-601.666.111.111.111.000"
coordinatePrecision	Unknown
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Type status not recognised	Failed
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 55 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Name match metric		higherMatch
	scientificName	Fabaceae Dioclea fimbriata Huber	Fabaceae
	class		Magnoliopsida
	taxonConceptID		364359
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		115461
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Dioclea
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Fabales
	taxonRank	ESPECIE	family
	specificEpithet	fimbriata
	Order id		395724
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Family id		364359
	family	Fabaceae	Fabaceae
	Taxon rank id		5000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Huber
	Right		128207
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	26/08/87	1987-08-26
	year	1987	1987
	day	26	26
	month	8	08
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	1997	1997
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	typeStatus	TYPUS
	identificationRemarks	specimen
	identifiedBy	J. Grimes,
Occurrence	occurrenceID	3540350
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	C.A. Cid Ferreira;	C.A. Cid Ferreira;
	Rightsholder	MO
	recordNumber	9229
	bibliographicCitation	Herb√°rio Virtual REFLORA Dispon√≠vel em: http://herbariovirtualreflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/herbarioVirtual/ConsultaPublicoHVUC/ConsultaPublicoHVUC.do?idTestemunho=3540350
	institutionCode	MO
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	MO1665831
	collectionCode	MO
Attribution	Data resource		Amostras brasileiras repatriadas do Jardim Botânico de Missouri
	Data provider uid		dp5
	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr235
	Data partner		Programa Reflora/CNPq
Location	decimalLatitude	108.330.555.555.555.000
	country	Brazil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Amazonas
	decimalLongitude	-601.666.111.111.111.000
	locality	Mun. S√£o Luiz do Anau√°, Roraima. Estrada Perimetral Norte (BR-210), 02 km da cidade de S√£o Luiz. Afloramento rochosao.
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: MO:MO1665831

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by