Occurrence record: RB:RB00134806

Specimen of Ocotea lanceolata recorded on 1986-05-14

API

Dataset

Data resource	dr216
institutionCode	Supplied institution code "JBRJ"
collectionCode	Supplied collection code "RB"
catalogNumber	RB00134806
otherCatalogNumbers	RB 250180
occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:134806
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	J D C Arouck Ferreira
Identified date	28/7/1986
Collector	Leite, P.F.\|Klein, R.M. Supplied as "P F Leite; R M Klein"
recordNumber	17
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)
fieldNotes	Floresta semidecidual, solo arenoso, relevo suave ondulado
Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
occurrenceRemarks	Arvore com 15m de altura, diametro a altura do peito 35cm, diametro da cpoa 5m (fanerófita). Flor verde. Casca em escamas e abundantes lenticelas. cor cinza
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided
dateIdentified	28/7/1986

Event

Occurrence date	1986-05-14 Supplied date "14/05/1986"
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Ocotea lanceolata Supplied scientific name "Ocotea lanceolata Nees"
taxonRank	species Supplied as "sp."
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Laurales
Family	Lauraceae
Genus	Ocotea
Species	Ocotea lanceolata
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Canonical name match The supplied name was parsed into canonical form before a match was found.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
scientificNameAuthorship	Nees

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Mato Grosso do Sul
locality	Fazenda ideal.
fieldNotes	Floresta semidecidual, solo arenoso, relevo suave ondulado
municipality	Eldorado
countryCode	BR

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 18 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the month	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Missing identification date	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Missing taxonomic rank	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 9 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 57 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Kingdom not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the year	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Collection code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Institution code not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Ocotea lanceolata
	Name match metric		canonicalMatch
	scientificName	Ocotea lanceolata Nees	Ocotea lanceolata
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		334647
	taxonConceptID		320770
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		129415
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom		Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Ocotea	Ocotea
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Laurales
	taxonRank	sp.	species
	specificEpithet	lanceolata
	Order id		395734
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		320770
	Family id		364443
	family	Lauraceae	Lauraceae
	Taxon rank id		7000
	scientificNameAuthorship	Nees
	Right		129415
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate	14/05/1986	1986-05-14
	year	1986	1986
	day	14	14
	month	05	05
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	dateIdentified	28/7/1986
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	J D C Arouck Ferreira
Occurrence	occurrenceID	urn:catalog:JBRJ:RB:134806
	fieldNotes	Floresta semidecidual, solo arenoso, relevo suave ondulado
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	P F Leite; R M Klein	Leite, P.F.\|Klein, R.M.
	modified	2014-07-22 08:56:22.503894	2014-07-22
	Rightsholder	Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
	datasetName	RB - Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Herbarium Collection
	recordNumber	17
	otherCatalogNumbers	RB 250180
	institutionCode	JBRJ
	occurrenceRemarks	Arvore com 15m de altura, diametro a altura do peito 35cm, diametro da cpoa 5m (fanerófita). Flor verde. Casca em escamas e abundantes lenticelas. cor cinza
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	RB00134806
	collectionCode	RB
Attribution	license	CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages)	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
Attribution	Data resource uid	dr216
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Mato Grosso do Sul
	municipality	Eldorado
	locality	Fazenda ideal.
	countryCode	BR

Occurrence record: RB:RB00134806

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by