Occurrence record: CEPEC:39244

Specimen of Eriosema rufum var. rufum recorded on 1986-02-01

API

Dataset

Data partner	Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental
Data resource	Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
institutionCode	Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira Supplied institution code "Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira"
collectionCode	Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau Supplied collection code "CEPEC"
catalogNumber	39244
otherCatalogNumbers	16/10/2014
occurrenceID	BRA:CEPLAC:CEPEC:39244
basisOfRecord	Preserved specimen
identifiedBy	E. S. Cândido
Collector	A. M. de Carvalho
recordNumber	2157
License	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int) Supplied as Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 License.
ownerInstitutionCode	Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
Rightsholder	CEPEC - Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
datasetName	CEPEC - Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
language	pt
occurrenceStatus	present
Abcd identification qualifier	Not provided

Event

Occurrence date	1986-02-01 Supplied as year:1986 month:02 day:01
Date precision	Day

Taxonomy

scientificName	Eriosema rufum var. rufum Supplied scientific name "Eriosema rufum rufum"
taxonRank	variety
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Tracheophyta
class	Magnoliopsida
Order	Fabales
Family	Fabaceae
Genus	Eriosema
Species	Eriosema rufum
Taxonomic issue	No issues
Name match metric	Exact match The supplied name matched the name exactly.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
infraspecificEpithet	rufum

Geospatial

Country	Brasil
State or Territory	Mato Grosso
locality	Caminho para Faz. Roselândia. Ca. 8Km a SE Cuiabá.
municipality	CUIABÁ

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
First of the month	Warning
Occurrence status assumed to be present	Warning
Name not in national checklists	Warning
Show/Hide 19 passed properties
Basis of record not supplied	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Invalid collection date	Passed
Incomplete collection date	Passed
First of the year	Passed
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation	Passed
Collector name unparseable	Passed
Missing catalogue number	Passed
Data are generalised	Passed
Collection code not recognised	Passed
Institution code not recognised	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Name not recognised	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Location not supplied	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Show/Hide 11 missing properties
Missing an identification qualifier	Missing
Missing identification references	Missing
Missing identification date	Missing
Missing taxonomic rank	Missing
Decimal coordinates not supplied	Missing
Missing geodetic datum	Missing
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence	Missing
Missing georeferenced protocol	Missing
Missing georeferenced sources	Missing
Missing georeferenced verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 53 tests that have not been run
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Habitat incorrect for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing coordinate precision	Unchecked (lack of data)
Homonym issues with supplied name	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Precision / range mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Cultivated / escapee	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
unrecognisedOccurrenceStatus	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Possible duplicate record	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Date precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Higher taxonomy missing	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Media unrepresentative for taxon	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude Longitude calculated from grid reference	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Badly formed altitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero longitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Image URL invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
No collection date supplied	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied country not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Invalid geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unable to convert UTM coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status not recognised	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth out of range	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted from UTM	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
First of the century	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unparseable verbatim coordinates	Unchecked (lack of data)
Zero latitude	Unchecked (lack of data)
Day and month transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision not valid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Identification date before occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Outside expert range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)

Group	Field Name	Original Value	Processed Value
Classification	Name parse type		SCIENTIFIC
	Species		Eriosema rufum
	Name match metric		exactMatch
	scientificName	Eriosema rufum rufum	Eriosema rufum var. rufum
	class		Magnoliopsida
	Genus id		319161
	taxonConceptID		319256
	Kingdom id		395630
	Left		126722
	infraspecificEpithet	rufum
	phylum		Tracheophyta
	kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Class id		395632
	genus	Eriosema	Eriosema
	Subspecies id		319256
	Phylum id		395631
	order		Fabales
	taxonRank		variety
	specificEpithet	rufum
	Order id		395724
	Subspecies		Eriosema rufum var. rufum
	Taxonomic issue		["noIssue"]
	Species id		319250
	Family id		364359
	family	Fabaceae	Fabaceae
	Taxon rank id		8010
	Right		126722
Event	Date precision		Day
	eventDate		1986-02-01
	year	1986	1986
	day	01	1
	month	02	02
Identification	Abcd identification qualifier		Not provided
	identificationQualifier		Not provided
	identifiedBy	E. S. Cândido
Occurrence	occurrenceID	BRA:CEPLAC:CEPEC:39244
	ownerInstitutionCode	Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
	basisOfRecord	PreservedSpecimen	PreservedSpecimen
	recordedBy	A. M. de Carvalho	A. M. de Carvalho
	modified	2023-03-28 09:46:57-03	2023-03-28
	Rightsholder	CEPEC - Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
	datasetName	CEPEC - Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
	language	pt
	recordNumber	2157
	otherCatalogNumbers	16/10/2014
	institutionCode	Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
	occurrenceStatus		present
	catalogNumber	39244
	collectionCode	CEPEC
Attribution	Collection uid		co140
	Data resource		Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
	Institution uid		in45
	Collection name		Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau
	Data provider uid		dp20
	Institution name		Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
	license	Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 License.	CC-BY-NC 4.0 (Int)
	Data resource uid	dr261
	Data partner		Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental
Location	country	Brasil	Brasil
	stateProvince	Mato Grosso
	municipality	CUIABÁ
	locality	Caminho para Faz. Roselândia. Ca. 8Km a SE Cuiabá.

Occurrence record: CEPEC:39244

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

Additional properties

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by